Let's analyze a
Zogby poll, shall we? Read it first, then come back.
"A majority of those polled trust FOX News over any other televised news source."
Well, that's obviously because FOX is
fair and balanced, duh! But really, Fox? I'm impressed. My positive feelings are obviously quickly relieved as I read on to see that the New York Times is the most trusted
written news source. Continuing on, though...
94.2% of Republicans surveyed and 55.6% of Democrats surveyed believe media coverage influenced the Presidential election.I guess no real surprise there, I mean who likes to proudly delegate their candidate's victory to bias news? Okay, well obviously 55.6% of Democrats, but I suppose Republicans are more standard examples of human psychological behavior anyway. They, it seems, chalk up their loss to bias media, just like a 3rd grade little leaguer claiming the umpire struck him out. That is a prime example of human nature right there!
Now it gets interesting...
Of those surveyed, 37.6% said they consider the Internet the most reliable source of news, 20.3% consider national television news most reliableand 16% say radio is the most reliable source. By the very nature of what I am doing right now, I would obviously fall into that category. Basil over at IMAO
makes the quantum leap to indicate that blogs are, indeed, the most trust news source around, but I don't exactly follow that logic. It is interesting to see, however, that the
delivery of said news is so important to the trustworthiness of its
content. It what way is news delivered on CNN less reliable than that posted on CNN.com, as Basil so eloquently pointed out?
One last tidbit, for the road...
...survey respondents named Rush Limbaugh(12.5%), Bill O’Reilly(10.1%) and Tom Brokaw (8.5%) the most trusted names in news...
That doesn't even deserve the dignity of a response.